<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: avvenu</title>
	<link>http://www.geochurn.com/avvenu/</link>
	<description>news &#038; stuff for the ADD inclined</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Manish</title>
		<link>http://www.geochurn.com/avvenu/#comment-21</link>
		<author>Manish</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geochurn.com/avvenu/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>I agree with your two drawbacks, though i am not a mac user. but i love the sharing feature...agree, very cool. I dont think it will get nixxed...you cant download and more importantly music labels will need to balance public opinion. I think everyone is sick and tired of them already trying to enforce their silly rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your two drawbacks, though i am not a mac user. but i love the sharing feature&#8230;agree, very cool. I dont think it will get nixxed&#8230;you cant download and more importantly music labels will need to balance public opinion. I think everyone is sick and tired of them already trying to enforce their silly rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ageonetta</title>
		<link>http://www.geochurn.com/avvenu/#comment-22</link>
		<author>ageonetta</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.geochurn.com/avvenu/#comment-22</guid>
					<description>this is where the whole things gets a little fuzzy. i don't see anything wrong with it. afterall...it's your music.  you've allegedly bought the rights for it by buying it. everyone has been paid. you're just storing it somewhere else.  and i agree...you're who you let listen to it is irrelevant if they aren't able to download it.

i don't claim to be any kind of legal expert, but here's where i see the legal crux being. the law does not define whether or not one should have to own the place where you store digital music in order to keep it in the realm of your legal ownership. in other words, do i need to actually 'own' this server where i'm storing my music in order to say that it is legally still mine? or what about using the music for 'broadcast use'? i don't know...just throwing it out there. curious to know other opinions on this as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is where the whole things gets a little fuzzy. i don&#8217;t see anything wrong with it. afterall&#8230;it&#8217;s your music.  you&#8217;ve allegedly bought the rights for it by buying it. everyone has been paid. you&#8217;re just storing it somewhere else.  and i agree&#8230;you&#8217;re who you let listen to it is irrelevant if they aren&#8217;t able to download it.</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t claim to be any kind of legal expert, but here&#8217;s where i see the legal crux being. the law does not define whether or not one should have to own the place where you store digital music in order to keep it in the realm of your legal ownership. in other words, do i need to actually &#8216;own&#8217; this server where i&#8217;m storing my music in order to say that it is legally still mine? or what about using the music for &#8216;broadcast use&#8217;? i don&#8217;t know&#8230;just throwing it out there. curious to know other opinions on this as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

